Critical and technical thinkers are often ahead of consensus science which has a 17-year cyclical shift. Critiques of charlatans like Corey Goode and David Wilcock shouldn’t be based solely on something as flimsy as consensus science.
YouTube Description: Critical thinking – first episode of the year in which many woo woo people get shit from me. CW Chanter ZZenn David Wilcock Jordan Sather Edge of Wonder Kerry Cassidy Corey Goode
- 01:08 CW [Chanter?] and Unspirituality Channel (Zenn) criticism of David Wilcock and Corey Goode is weak due to mushy thinking based on “consensus” or mainstream
- 08:00 Defending one’s ideas to smart, technical people requires critical thinking
- 15:00 Modern Medicine is cyclical; Boscovich
- 17:25 17-year consensus cycle; Corruption in academia
- 21:00 Corey Goode and David Wilcock
- 22:30 Kerry Cassidy
- 27:00 Quantum physics is bogus; Einstein and Feynman are useless
- 29:25 Geology has a 37 year consensus shift; Archeology: 28 years
- 31:44 Jordan Sather, Edge of Wonder, Q – Double-Culting and Triple-Culting; MMS
- 34:20 Corey Goode lawsuit against Clif; CW Chanter
- 36:20 Kozyrev
- 37:30 Steve Cambian
- 41:50 Problem with electron microscopes
- 44:25 AI – No such thing as a sentient computer
- 46:05 Nimitz UFO and Boscovich
Direct video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnMnbFCyJxA
